Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Southern (evangelist) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Daniel Southern (evangelist)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was nominated for deletion 2011 and closed as No Consensus. At the AfD, some people claimed that there were Google hits, but none were provided. None have been added to the article since then. The article as it is written almost qualifies for BLP PROD, but I am sending it to AfD to be safe. A Google News search for "'Daniel Southern' evangelist" (name in quotes) shows no hits. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Xaxing (talk) 02:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Xaxing (talk) 02:22, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete other than being quoted by the New York Times I find very little in the was of reliable sources. Still misses meeting the significant coverage part of general notability guidelines. EricSerge (talk) 04:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:BIO. Subject has not received significant coverage in multiple published reliable sources. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:43, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - I agree, if there were so many sources in the past AfD, why weren't any added? I can't really find any searching today. Smmurphy(Talk) 16:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep at most -- a bad article, but on someone who might just be notable. Nevertheless, I am not convinced that most of Billy Graham's associates were notable.  Crusade director probably refers to a behind the scenes organiser, who would not be much in the public eye.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:10, 5 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.