Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Stevens (soccer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:28, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Daniel Stevens (soccer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

PROD contested by with the explanation of "This player is considered notable." However, there appears little proof of this to me as the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:56, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 11:59, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 11:59, 5 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 11:59, 5 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete – shows no indication of notability per WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG, as he didn't play in a fully professional league. – Kosm  1  fent  15:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: As the nominator said, this articles fails all criteria of notability. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 01:34, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:33, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:42, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. --sparkl!sm hey! 19:35, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.