Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Stisen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:28, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Daniel Stisen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Extremely puffy promotional article with a dearth of sourcing. The sources given in the article are not reliable / independent, and on a search I'm not finding enough in-depth sources to pass WP:NACTOR, WP:NSPORT, or WP:GNG. The No.wiki article is similarly undersourced.

On a search, I found an article that described him as "relatively unknown" and stated that he appears in a "small role called 'Russian bodyguard'". The rest of it is mostly fluffy interview - "how was it on set?" etc. There's also two pieces in the (regional) Sorlandet edition of NPK that are basically the same kind of "Local boy wants to make it big in Hollywood" pieces - and.

I don't believe it's sufficient to pass any of the notability criteria mentioned above. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:27, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:27, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:27, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:27, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:27, 12 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete I can't find any additional sources besides this interview, which is duplicated here. Neither site strikes me as reliable. Skeletor3000 (talk) 23:51, 12 December 2019 (UTC)


 * I would like to contest this deletion, we could improve the proof of Daniel Stisen for Wikipedia. I read that you do not find the articles relative, then we can provide more proof. Stisen has been in the limelight for more then 15 years, included two documentary about his life, he has done celebrity reality shows in Norway, at least two of the articles at NRK was the most read of the week in the whole country. He has more then 40 film credits over the last 5 years and he was among the top three most famous bodybuilders in Norway an decade ago. He is one of the leading roles in a new Netflix film. All this can proof thought links from major media pages I would like to provide asap and IMDB. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrMuscle007 (talk • contribs)


 * Preserve - My name is James Keating and I am an Oxford-based author and 24-year veteran screenwriter. I've known Daniel Stisen for five-years and in that time, we've worked together on nine different films.  I am very surprised that there is any question of his eligibility for a Wikipedia entry.  Like I say, Daniel and I have collaborated many times, with him as the lead actor and in projects of considerable note.  I would be happy to update his Wiki entry myself, accrediting and corroborating his latest achievements and also to reflect his current standing in the industry.  I must start by drawing attention to a prominent article published only three-months ago, announcing him as the joint third lead in a Netflix film, by Oscar-winning producer Alain Depardieu, https://www.filmneweurope.com/news/romania-news/item/118660-production-original-netflix-production-back-2-back-shoots-in-Romania makeajesting (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * James, you may want to read our conflict-of-interest guideline, which discourages the editing of articles where one has an off-wiki relationship with the subject. The article you linked is merely a production announcement that mentions the subject's name. It is not substantially about the subject and does not count as a reliable source for the purpose of showing notability. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 17:14, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for mentioning the COI. I'd like to add that, if we find sources that establish the subject's notability, it would be acceptable for User:Makeajesting to suggest additional sources on the article's talk page. Skeletor3000 (talk) 17:25, 13 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - I'm sorry, but while we have to assume that this was written in good faith, as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia does not publish original research. After 18 years, however, everyone should know what Wikipedia is, and what it is not. A 24-year-old is not a "veteran" even if one does have six films' experience. Now, if I were to cut out all of the original research in this essay, there would be very little to write a "stub" article. If you want me to edit it, please "ping" me, and  I'll go ahead. Bearian (talk) 18:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.