Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Street


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 20:56, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Daniel Street

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Remove--not a notable person. Hundreds and hundreds of scholars in Cambridge have the same profile as this person.Wikipedia is a untrust worthy source for academic articles (talk) 19:22, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note Fixed the AfD. Raymie Humbert (t • c) 19:32, 2 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * claimed notability is as a broadcaster, not a scholar.   DGG ( talk ) 05:43, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Not notable. One Television Correspondent does not suffice a Wiki Entry. What was his mark in reporting?62.173.69.98 (talk) 09:28, 3 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. If he is indeed a significant Australian television news programme's political correspondent, then he's definitely notable as somebody whom appears in the public eye on a regular basis. Esteffect (talk) 01:50, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Hmm. Street is a chief correspondent on Nine Network and is considered a top journalist in Australia. He is the 2009 winner of the National Press Club of Australia's annual award for contributions to journalism. SteveStrummer (talk) 04:49, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Certainly a very sparse article, but judging on the amount of information out there about Mr. Street, with a little tender-loving care, it would be able to shake off the stub tag and avoid the appearance of non-notability. Certainly satisfies WP:BIO. AP1787 (talk) 03:05, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.