Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Torres (American Politician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Daniel Torres (American Politician)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLP of a smalltown municipal councillor, not properly referenced as passing WP:NPOL #2. As always, city or town councillors are not all "inherently" notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- the key to making a person at this level of political office notable enough for inclusion is to write a substantial article about his political significance (specific things he did, specific projects he spearheaded, specific effects he had on the development of the community, etc.), referenced to a depth and range of coverage that suggests a credible reason to treat him as a special case of significantly greater notability than the norm for town councillors. But that's not what's here: this is essentially "he exists, so here's a bit of biographical trivia that has no bearing on notability at all", and it's referenced to just two pieces of run of the mill local coverage in the local media where local coverage of local town councillors is merely expected and his paid-inclusion wedding notice in the nearby big-city paper, which is nowhere near enough coverage. Bearcat (talk) 11:57, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and New York. Bearcat (talk) 11:57, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: I agree with the nom. I was planning to AfD this myself on the same basis. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:51, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Local politician fails WP:NPOL. Novemberjazz 03:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have not found anything that allows Torres to pass WP:NPOL. I think the author has had enough chances in this articles various incarnations to demonstrate notability and has not done so.--Mpen320 (talk) 23:26, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Never heard of him. NYC Guru (talk) 07:48, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely fails WP:NPOL. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.