Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Visevic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Max S em 08:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Daniel Visevic

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Football player not yet with professional contract. PROD contested by the creating editor for the following reason detailed in the edit summary "This article should not be deleted as Daniel Visevic has an involvement with Melbourne Victory Football Club, and is notable because of this." While the article makes an unreferenced claim that the subject is training with Melbourne Victory, he has yet to sign with them regardless of rumours. Mattinbgn/talk 10:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  -- Mattinbgn/talk 10:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment; he was a Young Socceroo John Vandenberg 12:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment makingv the national Under-20 team (as opposed to the adult team) does not meet notability requirements ChrisTheDude 08:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Checked various sites and it seems largely speculative. By all indications he probably will be notable in a few years though, however WP:CRYSTAL Orderinchaos 17:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Playing for Australia national under-20 football team isnt notable enough? If the problem is the CRYSTAL problems, I'll turn it into a stub. John Vandenberg 10:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Junior representative sport does not make one notable by itself. See WP:BIO for athletes for details on what makes an athlete notable. -- Mattinbgn/talk 10:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete until such time as he makes it to the first team squad of a professional team. On a side note, the VPL is a really unfortunate name for a league ;-) ChrisTheDude 08:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree not notable. No secondary sources, therefore not notable. One mention in a newspaper article doesn't make the subject notable.Assize 10:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete For the record a really good player! I've been lucky enough to see him in action. However, until he gets up there, it would be difficult or impossible to write an encyclopaedic article about him. So I would say delete, without prejudice against future recreation as I think he will get there sooner rather than later. Zivko85 12:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Do not Delete He is a notable player, as he was in a reputable secondary source, here on the 8th page, .  Therefore he is reputable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bickers89 (talk • contribs)


 * Comment The source provided above by Bickers89 does state that the subject played in a competitive match with Melbourne Victory; 20 minutes in one game in a World Club Championship qualifier as a 16 year old in 2005 and at the time was on a four week professional contract. While this does not change my opinion it may be relevant for others. -- Mattinbgn/talk 04:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - as the player has not yet played in a professional league, per WP:BIO. The World Club Championship is a cup competition, not a professional league.  robwingfield «T•C» 14:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable yet. Come back when he's signed with a fully professional team.  Lankiveil 23:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.