Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Wallock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  15:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Daniel Wallock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. No coverage. scope_creep (talk) 17:41, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:46, 27 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete The best source is the LA Times story about a law suit brought by Wallock's parents against an insurance company that refused to pay for medical care he needed as an infant. He was born with heart defects, but this does not make him a notable person.  His claim to notability is summarised itn citation #5 "20-Year-Old Open-Heart Surgery Survivor Found His Passion In Social Media Marketing, an interview by one of the many bloggers hosted by Forbes.  Article Sourced almost exclusively to blog posts hosted by  Forbes.  Plus a blog post hosted by HuffPost.  Article also cites a USA Today article which is a dead link; but I can't find the article and cannot, therefore, tell whether it is a reported piece.  Fails WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:33, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete As E.M.Gregory says, sources seem to be limited to promotional material, and there's not enough to be able to write a neutral article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:11, 4 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.