Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel William Farnworth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Speedy per G5, obviously banned user NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 18:09, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Daniel William Farnworth

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Is "first and only dual-citizen, junior trap shooter in Canada." of sufficient notability? It doesn't sound like it to me, but if it is, the article is still full of non-notable trivia - and I don't want to spend time cleaning it out if there's insufficient notability to start with. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, A7 with not notability presented. You know an article is getting really desperate when the subject has to stoop to stuff like listing his pets (!) just to pad it out, not to mention trying to use Mywikibiz as a reference(!!!)  I'd laugh but that's just plain sad. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:01, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * This article is a good example of a youth sportsman, with much local notability, but not internationally or referenced on the internet, check out many shooting magazines and you'll see his name mentioned all over the place, along with David Ball and Andrew Waddington, this person has been through alot in his life, and put in more money than any so called notable artist nowadays that you see on TV or anywhere else for that matter. — HeyManCanIContribute (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Speedy delete, A7, G5 (banned user), see Sockpuppet investigations/RealDanMan14/Archive. I count seven eight sockpuppet accounts in this entry alone, including one on this AFD page. Already salted at Dan Farnworth. Hairhorn (talk) 17:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as article fails notability criteria for sportler. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  17:23, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Tagged as such. Chris (talk) 17:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Does not pass A7. Furthermore, fails WP:ANYBIO, as I can't find reliable sources. P. D. Cook  Talk to me! 17:30, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable - being 'first and only' is not a certain guarantee of notability. Looks more like a social networking page than an encyclopaedia entry. There's more irrelevancy in it than info, and there's precious little info to show any sort of notability by Wikipedia standards. Peridon (talk) 17:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.