Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Williams (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  05:42, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Daniel Williams (actor)

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable actor. Article does not assert any further claims to notability other than being an extra in the television series, Home and Away. -- Longhair\talk 03:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete -- Longhair\talk 03:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Longhair\talk 03:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 23:56, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Haha, Wikipedia is not a place to brag about being an extra on Home and Away. --Candy-Panda 03:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO by miles and miles, no notibility.--Dacium 03:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:N and WP:BIO - IMDB contains over 10 Daniel Williams's, but this isn't one of them. Must admit I like Candy-Panda's construction above :) Orderinchaos78 14:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. If he was a regular actor on Home and Away, he would warrant an article but not as an extra. Capitalistroadster 03:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. If he's not in IMDB, there's no reason for him to have a wikipedia article. --Lee Vonce 16:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons above. QazPlm 04:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete What next, an article on people appearing in crowd scenes of various television series? User:Dimadick
 * Delete, I was once in the background, behind the reporter, during an "on the scene" news broadcast. That makes me about as notable as this chap.  Lankiveil 03:54, 26 January 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete. I can safely say that I am far more famous than this chap and I won't be getting an article any time soon.  --Roisterer 01:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.