Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Wolf Hohle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:SNOW Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Daniel Wolf Hohle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. Google returns almost nothing, and nothing of substance except his own taledent agency's bio of him. Largoplazo (talk) 20:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * There is a procedure for handling articles not in english, it involves having them translated before putting them up at AfD, so that other editors can follow the discussion. DES (talk) 20:13, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Even using Google Translate, there appears to be no claims of notability. That said, I had nominated this for BLPPROD...  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Had the text as provided by google translate been the text of the article, I would have declined an A7 speedy pending some validation of the claims. However, that is not evidence of notability. I think waiting for translation would be better practice, but It seems i was wrong about the rules on that. DES (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * There's no guideline that requires an article to be in English before any other reviewing activity, up to and including all approaches to deletion, is conducted (much as sources don't have to be in English for them to be considered sufficient to establish notability and to verify assertions made in articles). The first paragraph of WP:PNT even affirms this. Largoplazo (talk) 21:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, no evidence of notabilty and clearly promotional and written with a COI., WP:PNT procedure is clear, an article not being in English does not exempt an article from other forms of deletion as long as the reason for deletion is not "Not in English", this extends to CSD, PROD, BLPROD & AFD-- Jac 16888 Talk 20:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: unsourced BLP, fails WP:GNG. Google returns two pages of unique hits, but nothing more than the usual social media accounts and a few passing mentions in lists of persons. --HyperGaruda (talk) 20:33, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources to satisfy WP:BIO, in English, Portuguese, or any other language. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article does not have any sources. Bmbaker88 (talk) 12:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT. Please it's WRITTEN ENTIRELY IN CAPS, it can't even be properly machine translated, and would have to be translated manually, typed out in normal lettering, and transwikied at least twice. Bearian (talk) 14:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy snow delete let's not waste any more time with this, it's not even in English. With this kind of thing I think it would be better to move directly into draft space or somewhere and then prod it or just decline. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 04:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.