Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel watson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete Mindmatrix 00:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Daniel watson
I wasn't able to verify anything in this article, so it doesn't meet WP:V. Most likely a hoax. Kevin 07:07, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

I can find no poet by that name. Nonforma 07:05, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. None of the information could be verified. Movementarian 07:58, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Alan Au 08:02, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Found nothing on google. Forbsey 08:06, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete No verification in Google search for "Daniel Watson" poet see 	Two Google book results neither confirms the claim see
 * Delete Two Google scholar neither confirms the result see . Through the Canberra library service's online service I checked the Literature Resource Centre which contains 120,000 authors. Daniel Watson was not among them. Capitalistroadster 08:12, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - he doesn't exist. Technostalgia
 * Delete, after extensive googling, I can't find him. Besides, if he committed treason, he would have been beheaded or hung, drawn and quartered in the 17th century, not merely hung.  Jtmichcock 23:19, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * delete this content - possibly use the article name as a redirect to Danny Watson. Grutness...wha?  04:25, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unverified hoax bio. I think an admin decision to close this early would be appropriate here. Turnstep 15:50, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax. Stifle 23:30, 11 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.