Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniela Hamaui


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Mailer Diablo 09:46, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Daniela Hamaui
Delete per possible WP:VAIN and fails WP:BIO. SynergeticMaggot 04:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO. Shenme 05:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep and expand. Lazy nomination per L'espresso is a major weekly founded in 1955, see it:L'espresso. ~ trialsanderrors 06:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep under the condition it is expanded and the paper is notable as Shenme alleges. Michael 07:14, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I think you're talking about me, since Shenme voted Delete. How hard is this? I get 1,090 hits on google.it, including . Seems like she also created some controversy. ~ trialsanderrors 07:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Editors of major news magazines are certainly notable enough. up+land 13:06, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * keep please editors of major news magazines are important too Yuckfoo 19:31, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment editors of newspapers are notable. So wheres the notability established on this article? As far as I could tell, its a one liner. There's no BIO here in the first place. Its unencycolpedic and could possibly be merged to the actual newpaper's article (if there is one). SynergeticMaggot 19:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You're contradicting yourself here. editors of newspapers are notable. So wheres the notability established on this article? It's in the one line that's in the article by your own criterion, and the article is clearly marked as a stub. Merger proposals are not done via AfD. ~ trialsanderrors 19:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand.--A. B. 02:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.