Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniele Servadei


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 14:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Daniele Servadei

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Semi-advertorialized ("paving the future of digital ecommerce and revolutionizing the way digital products are sold online") WP:BLP of an e-commerce/cryptocurrency entrepreneur, not properly referenced as passing our inclusion criteria for businesspeople. As always, CEOs of their own startups are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they and their companies exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on the sourcing -- but two of the four footnotes here are pieces of the subject's own bylined writing, and the other two are Q&A interviews in which he's answering questions about himself and his work in the first person, which means that absolutely none of them represent third-party coverage about him in sources independent of himself. We require sources in which he's the subject of coverage and analysis being written by other people, not sources in which he's the one doing the speaking. There may also be some form of conflict of interest here, as this was created by a brand-new user who appears to have intentionally tried to game autoconfirmed status: they basically twiddled and fiddled with unnecessary busywork edits to this in sandbox ("just infobox, then save, then section headers without content, then save, then remove entry fields not planned for use from the infobox, then save, then finally add the actual body text only at the end") to turn the page's creation into a 14-edit processs instead of one, and then immediately moved the page into mainspace themself as soon as they'd crossed the four-day hump for gaining page-move privileges -- and the body text edits both tripped the "Possible self promotion in userspace" filter due to the semi-advertorialism. Bearcat (talk) 13:30, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Italy. Bearcat (talk) 13:30, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I can find no coverage that ticks all the boxes (reliable, independent, secondary) and which give the subject significant depth of coverage - hence, this is a GNG fail. Girth Summit  (blether)  13:36, 7 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nominator unless additional reliable third-party coverage can be found. BogLogs (talk) 13:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nominator, fails guidelines, looks like self promotion. --hroest 15:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete more crypto fluff, trying to meet GNG. Hardly even mentioned in anything that isn't a crypto blog or PR piece, long way from notability. Oaktree b (talk) 16:52, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom. Would not be surprised if the SPA that wrote this article was a UPE. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - It seems like his company Selix might be the thing to write an article about if it has as much money and as many employees as it says. It doesn't seem like this person has much coverage on his own.KatoKungLee (talk) 17:15, 11 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.