Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniella Alonso


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was MOVE material in Daniela Alonso to Daniella Alonso, which is apparantly the correct spelling, and make Daniela Alonso a redirect to Daniella Alonso. (I moved the material as a simple copy-and-paste move, considering that (1) it's a very small article, (2) the articles under both spellings have a significant history, and (3) I do not know how to do this page history merge which is spoken of. If it wasn't just a stub I wouldn't close, but this is one of the last remaining for this date.) Herostratus 04:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Daniella Alonso
This article has an incorrect title. This article should actually be at Daniela Alonso. Daniela Alonso has already been created so I can't move the page. I have moved all of the information to this article. Daniella Alonso therefore simply needs to be deleted... godgoddingham333 10:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect as non-controversial mergers don't need an AfD discussion. Simply redirect the page next time. In any case, I seem to remember comments about merge and delete being a violation of the GFDL.--Chaser T 10:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment.Why do you think her name is spelled Daniela, Godgoddingham? The WB site lists her as Daniella, as does IMDB, Maxim and August Films (production company). Google gives us 111,000 for "daniella alonso" vs 599 for "daniela alonso". Please share your source. Natgoo 22:54, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge back and redirect per sources cited by Natgoo. Even if Daniela is the correct spelling, Chaser is right in that this would be a redirect (or page history merge if an admin was willing), not a deletion). -- NORTH talk 23:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to correct spelling, per Northenglish. -- nae'blis (talk) 03:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Move and therefore Redirect per common sense (and the people above). People who type in both spellings would find the article, which is a win-win.  Killfest2 — Daniel.Bryant  10:29, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.