Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniella Morris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy deleted per request of original poster. JDoorjam    JDiscourse 02:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Daniella Morris

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable teen model. A bunch of blogs for "references", and websites apparently run by her or her family or her promotional company. (probably User:Mtoa). Nothing like reliable sources to write an article from. Part of a "series", apparently. Image is probably a copyvio. — coe l acan — 05:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

How are websites such as Pageantry Magazine, Seventeen Magazine, and Youthnoise run by her, of her family, or promotional companies? Also where are their blogs listed on the references? I don't see any. Image isn't a copyright violation since I'm her manager and I run the website it was put on. You cannot just make accusations for fun or just because you want to because none of what your saying is correct. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mtoa (talk • contribs).
 * The Youthnoise site is a blog, her entry there is created and self-published there by her. Self-publishing is not reliable sourcing. Please see Reliable sources. Pageantry? Seventeen? These are the links you've provided: http://www.pageantrymagazine.com/ http://www.seventeen.com/ On neither of those pages do I see anything about your client. And the image still can't be used here, because it's a copyrighted image of a living person, that you haven't released under a free license. See Image use policy. You can release it under the gfdl-self or the cc-by-sa-2.5, and then the image can be used on Wikipedia, but keep in mind that this means anyone will be legally able to edit the image in any way and re-release it. So be very certain this is indeed what you want to do. — coe l acan — 06:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

It's actually NOT a blog, she wrote the article after Youthnoise contacted her asking her to write it, but it was received and published by Youth Noise. Pageantry Magazine and Seventeen Magazine were magazines which covered her stories just like Turn for the Judges magazine.
 * Comment Please see WP:A and WP:CITE for further information on what sort of sources are to used in articles, and how those articles are to be cited. It's not enough to say that your clients have been mentioned in Seventeen or another magazine without letting others know exactly where they've been mentioned. And no, we're not going to Google it for you.  You might want to take a look at WP:COI while you're at it. It is generally regarded as a conflict of interest around here to participate in deletion discussions about subjects in which you have a professional interest. ObtuseAngle 17:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * That's something of a flexible rule, especially as long as the article creator is candid about that professional interest. In this case, Mtoa has been asked, by myself and an admin, to participate in these deletion discussions. — coe l acan — 17:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay. I don't have a problem with that. ObtuseAngle 17:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Mtoa, I checked YouthNoise again. Right there on every page it says very clearly: "Register and post content". That's a blog. That means anyone can put anything there. I see no indication that Daniella was personally invited to do so. — coe l acan — 17:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete the contest appears to be very minor (hosted on tripod?). Notability isn't clear and cites aren't clearly covering the topic. --Hobit 23:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable ROxBo 00:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable and written by someone directly involved. --Wirbelwind ヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 00:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable --Slp1 01:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.