Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Calo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete (only 64% voted delete), but should be redirected to Nick Lachey. - ulayiti (talk)  00:16, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Danielle Calo
is WIkipedia a gossip column? I think this information fits better to Nick Lachey--Austrian 18:07, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge. Snogging someone vaguely famous does not mean you should be included in Wikipedia.The Land 18:33, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge - as usual, no need for deletion. Trollderella 18:34, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge (ahem) with Nick Lachey. Capitalistroadster 18:35, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as non-notable person. This isn't the National Enquirer; I don't think this even merits a merge.--Isotope23 18:44, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Would not even be a slightly interesting addition to Nick Lachey's article, so a merge is inappriopiate in my opinion. -- SoothingR 19:31, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. If the incident is important, it could be mentioned in Nick Lachey. Friday (talk) 20:01, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Whoop de do. I'll bet six months from now, only her and her friends will remember or care about the incident. Kissing a 'celebrity' (I use the term loosely) does not make you one. Could pass WP:BIO on on a stretch of Persons achieving renown or notoriety for their involvement in newsworthy events, but as I said above, a few months from now, nobody will care, and someone else will have pashed Nick Lachey. Delete. Saberwyn 22:17, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * While we're at it, can someone who knows how (and when best to) put the picture up for deletion? Saberwyn 22:25, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Saberwyn --JAranda &#124; watz sup 23:29, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, trivial incident, one sentence in Nick Lachey if at all. MCB 00:16, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge - but maximum one brief sentence,and no photo for the  Nick Lachey page Bwithh 02:58, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Content was already added to Nick Lachey article on the 14th October, almost word for word, by user 69.133.71.146. Could someone who knows about ISPs let me know the significance of the similarity of this ISP to 69.133.70.224, the creator of this article. Saberwyn 04:32, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment, those are both Road Runner IP's. Road Runner uses dynamic IPs (or at least they used to) so there is a high probability that if the text is exactly the same it was added by the same person, just in two different sessions with their ISP.--Isotope23 13:46, 2 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.