Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Cortes DeVito


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I'm sorry Johnmoor, like others have said, she does great work but there's not quite enough coverage of it. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Danielle Cortes DeVito

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWs of substance. This pertains to the quality not the quantity of the references. The article has a some references, but the references are primary in nature or only briefly mention or quote the subject. Also not sure the awards mentioned are substantial enough to support the article. red dog six (talk) 22:27, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Keep! Although primary sources were cited to support the contents of the article, some significant secondary sources were also cited, including:
 * A copy of "Mrs. Chicago educates women on heart health" originally published by Daily Herald (Arlington Heights)
 * "Chicago Sky and Bank of America Honor Women of Inspiration" published by OurSports Central
 * "Saving a heart is as easy as checking the Heartsaver AED box on your income tax return!" published by State of Illinois
 * "Hooray for Hollywood here!" published by Chicago Sun-Times

* Note that this copy of "Mrs. Chicago educates women on heart health" originally published by Daily Herald (Arlington Heights) is showing just few paragraphs and not the complete article. Thank you. —JOHNMOORofMOORLAND (talk) 14:55, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I am torn on this one. She sounds like someone who has done and continues to do important work. She clearly has some local notability, and in a city the size of Chicago, local notability is significant. But very little of her coverage is from major media, and what is consists of passing mentions. The awards she has won are local - they are not "a well-known and significant award or honor" which would qualify her under WP:BIO. I'm afraid I am going to have to go for "delete" as not quite meeting Wikipedia's notability criteria. --MelanieN (talk) 17:10, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Difficult. As the nom says, she definitely does good work, but I'm not sure any of the sources do enough to establish notability. There are plenty of sources listed, but they all fall into one of three categories: database-style entries (including pages on employers' websites), non-feature length articles and sources which only mention her in passing. Non of this amounts to non-trivial coverage and so she fails GNG. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 23:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete not sufficient independent sources for notability. I see this article as promotional, and I do not see her as warranting encyclopedic coverage.  DGG ( talk ) 05:29, 17 June 2012 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.