Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Delaunay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. consensus is clear, but even had it not been, that it remains a BLP with no secondary sourcing at the end of an AfD is reason enough to close as delete. Onus is on keep voters to provide verification. Scott Mac (Doc) 11:51, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Danielle Delaunay

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Upgraded from PROD. Original concern was "Questionable noteworthiness; unsourced for three years.". I don't dispute notability is questionable, having searched for sources myself, but we have a large number of biographies on other (in fact, I believe just about every) current and former "Hello! Project" member. I have no opinion either way on deletion, but I think this is worthy of discussion. HJ Mitchell |  fancy a chat?   19:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - no valid reasons for deletion are stated. No effort has been made to fix the citation issues. She easily passes WP:MUSICBIO - former member of notable bands, toured, TV shows. I found over 20,000 Ghits.  There has to be something reliable in that pile. Bearian (talk) 20:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * For the record, I tried and failed to find sources and I personally am not advocating deletion, I just upgraded this from a PROD because I thought it was worthy of discussion and PRODs seem to be being over-used for potentially controversial deletions. Have you managed to find any sources? I'll be happy to assist in referencing the article if you can find something t reference it with. HJ Mitchell  |  fancy a chat?   21:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Clicking on the "news" link right next to "find sources" (above) I get zilch.  JBsupreme (talk) 20:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete 20,000 "Ghits" means nothing if they are all blogs and unreliable sources. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 13:42, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to Coconuts Musume. In fact there are only 268 Google hits. Abductive  (reasoning) 11:29, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.