Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Egnew (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. KTC (talk) 15:08, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Danielle Egnew
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be a WP:VANITY piece, but, more importantly, this person does not seem to be notable for anything in particular. She has had minor acting/directing roles and made a documentary that didn't receive much notice. As such, I think that WP:BIO would seem to indicate she is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Last deletion debate from 2005 was from before the notability guidelines were firmly in place. jps (talk) 02:01, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't believe that this is a Vanity piece in that I removed the unsourced material and references that went back to her own website. And I've learned that just because I am unfamiliar with a person, it does not mean that they are "not known" Cap020570 (talk) 02:50, 24 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - While I agree the subject's notability is questionable if qualifying under WP:ENT, I would submit that the subject is notable per WP:MUSIC with a significant discography with independent secondary source coverage (criterion 1), participating as a voting member of the Grammys and has received award recognitions for her folk recordings (criterion 9). Nmillerche (talk) 10:51, 24 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per Nmillerche. The case for notability under MUSIC seems fairly clear. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.