Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Meagher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Dublin Wives. Delete-and-redirect. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 22:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Danielle Meagher

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Individual fails notability criteria required of entertainers: WP:ENT states that to have a wikipedia page: "Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and celebrities: Individual fails all three. There is also an argument under the notable for 1 event WP:1E, as she is only known for 1 event in Ireland - Dublin Wives. In the UK she is barely known for Big Brother. There is also significant (near total) overlap with the biographies provided on the Dublin Wives.  I had hoped a merge would be the easiest option but the merge was reverted, with the user telling me to go for AFD. Rushton2010 (talk) 16:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.
 * Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.
 * Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment."


 * Keep per WP:1EVENT - Meagher is notable for two events, Dublin Wives and Celebrity Big Brother. In addition, there are numerous reliable sources which have reported on her, which is enough per WP:GNG.-- Laun  chba  ller  17:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Two appearances in reality TV shows are not the " significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions" required by the notability policy. Also WP:1EVENT, which you quote, supports merger/deletion:
 * "The general rule in many cases is to cover the event, not the person."
 * "Another issue arises when an individual plays a major role in a minor event. In this case, it is not generally appropriate to have an article on both the person and the event. Generally in this case, the name of the person should redirect to the article on the incident." ::*"When the role played by an individual in the event is less significant, an independent article may not be needed, and a redirect is appropriate."
 * Whether you consider her the "break out star" of Dublin Wives, or just one of the people in the show, the policy supports deletion or merge and redirect to Dublin Wives on every level. But at the end of the day, it doesn't trump the basic notability criteria which she fails on all three counts.--Rushton2010 (talk) 17:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:09, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:09, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:09, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Delete according to WP:GNG. — O'Dea  (talk) 18:27, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge to Dublin Wives. Not notable enough for a separate article. Snappy (talk) 20:36, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, then redirect to Dublin Wives. Not independently notable, and nothing here that needs merging.-- Mojo Hand (talk) 21:09, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.