Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Miraglia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. This appears to qualify as a G7 request as there are no other substantive edits to the article. Alternately, no-one has disputed the asserted lack of encyclopedic notability. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Danielle Miraglia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Since I wrote this 3 years ago, I have become more aware of the importance of reliable sources, and many of the current sources are borderline, if best -- mentions in newspapers of a performance date, coffee houses reiterating the standard "strong steady thumb" (probably written by a PR person and used again and again by promotional outlets), occasional mentions in local paper such as the Ambler Patch. The NY Times only mentions performance dates. The Bob Gottlieb review appears in a for-sale music site. I had hoped to find substantive reviews over the past 3 years. What is lacking by December 2013 are serious reviews by music critics (even in local papers) which suggest a serious artist at work or that there is some kind of audience building. I know pageview tallies are not a formal criterion for notability, but the current pageview count of only page 4 pageviews per day indicates a lack of attention. Accordingly, as initial creator, I am unfortunately recommending this article be deleted. Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:18, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per G7. Author requests deletion. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 22:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.