Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Rippeon-Nemetz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Danielle Rippeon-Nemetz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minimally sourced biography of a person notable only for having been murdered. Per longstanding Wikipedia consensus, every murder that happens is not automatically a suitable article topic just because it happened; some kind of enduring notability has to be demonstrated before it qualifies. But with just one source here, no reason has been shown why this murder would warrant being treated as a special case. Delete, unless somebody can show a lot more substance and sourcing and significance than this. Bearcat (talk) 22:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Unfortunate, as always, but no evidence this is a notable person to have a biographical article, nor a notable crime/event to justify an article.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  01:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete nothing to distinguish this person from hundreds of others shot to death annually, or killed in other ways.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete A tragedy with no indication of notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't pass WP:GNG and there is nothing extraordinary about this person's death to have a Wikipedia article about it. Mwenzangu (talk) 23:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.