Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Sheen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Salvio giuliano 22:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Danielle Sheen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Can't find any decent coverage in a WP:BEFORE search. The references in the article appear to be the best available. Two of the Liverpool Echo sources are obviously trivial mentions and Blackburn Rovers is not an independent source per WP:SPORTBASIC (team sites are generally not regarded as independent of the subject), being a website for her former employer. Lastly, Danielle clinches it and Sparkling Sheen both fail WP:YOUNGATH per the guidance on local coverage in clause 2; ''The second clause excludes the majority of local coverage in both news sources and sports specific publications. It especially excludes using game play summaries, statistical results, or routine interviews as sources to establish notability.'' A match summary for a local under-16 fixture clearly violates the criteria, so cannot be used to support notability. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football,  and England.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:50, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.