Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Vasinova (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Confused closure, the nomination has been withdrawn and article has already been moved to Draft space. I see no use in moving the article back to main space when there have been no editors advocating Delete so consider this a Procedural close. Liz Read! Talk! 07:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Danielle Vasinova
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable, does not meet ACTOR or GNG. Has only had bit parts in movies and TV. Some coverage about her relationship with Robert Herjavec from Shark Tank, but it's all gossip-style coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 04:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 04:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)


 * @Oaktree b Please see my withdraw request below. Naomijeans (talk) 17:06, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

It would be premature for anyone to vote and make a decision in an incomplete article. I will have a new version within a week. Naomijeans (talk) 17:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * WITHDRAW REQUEST - I am the creator of the article and have moved it to the draft because I was actually not done with it. You nominated this within 42 minutes of creation. You should probably give new articles a little more time. I have around 9 more citation that I have found, including one that is only available in Newspapers.com and very solid citation. Based on what I have she would meet WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. She is also a model. so qualification should not only be based on WP:ACTOR.


 * I don't know how to withdraw the request to be honest. Oaktree b (talk) 19:44, 24 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.