Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danijela Krstić


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Oregon. Spartaz Humbug! 22:51, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Danijela Krstić

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Formula artricle, seen one, seen them all. Per WP:NOPAGE this article should be redirected to Miss Oregon where the information is best presented in context as part of a list. The proposed redirect does not require establishing notability, which is hard to do in these cases anyway. The rest of the article is trivia like the names of her family members - although her father has an article because he was accused of war crimes! Her job as a dental hygienist does not suggest any future career that would mean she sees anything more then her 15 minutes of fame WP:15MOF. Legacypac (talk) 05:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as her notability is for winning the Miss Oregon title and notability is not temporary. Subject easily crosses the verifiability and notability thresholds with significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Notability is a threshold, not a competition, and once crossed does not require a steady stream of new notable accomplishments. - Dravecky (talk) 18:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * See WP:NTEMP which says "In particular, if reliable sources cover a person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual." Legacypac (talk) 20:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. sst✈(discuss) 19:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - I don't see any lasting notability here; no national coverage. State-wide pageant winners are not notable. —Мандичка YO 😜 08:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Miss Oregon as suggested by the nom and for the usual reasons (cheap, plausible, etc.) as well as my commentary on Articles for deletion/Lucy Fleck. - The Bushranger One ping only 11:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as a WP:GNG pass, per Dravecky. Ejgreen77 (talk) 01:17, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * With keep votes of greater then 1 per minute is Ejgreen77 even reading these articles or doing any evaluation of the sources? Legacypac (talk) 03:31, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, I did do evaluation before I voted. This AfD has been sitting open for nearly two weeks, so there was plenty of time to do it, and to assume otherwise is in very bad faith. Ejgreen77 (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure, you saved up all your votes to make them at once. NO answer provided to any policy based argument like [WP:NTEMP]] which says "In particular, if reliable sources cover a person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual." No answer reliable sources with in depth coverage provided.  Just a IHEART pageants and can copy paste responses across multiple AfDs at a rate greater then  per minute.  04:08, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep The number, scope and duration of the reliable and verifiable sources provided meet and exceed the notability standard. Alansohn (talk) 12:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 14:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Does not appear to have the potential for notability beyond her 15 minutes of fame. Lithorien (talk) 04:30, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per explanation by Мандичка. --Mondiad (talk) 03:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:ANYBIO. Not known for anything other than competition in beauty pageants. State pageant title holders don't meet WP:PAGEDECIDE on that alone. Blue   Riband►   14:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.