Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danna,Bagh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Bagh, Azad Kashmir. I note, however, that referencing is still needed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:15, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Danna,Bagh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of subject's notability, i.e. a grassy hill 40 km from a city in an unspecified country. (I have fixed that...) This version of the article read like a time share brochure. Nothing has inherent notability, so I'm not sure why this hill warrants an article, except that it is the "highest mountainous location in the north-eastern area of Bagh". There are no references or data for comparison to other hills. (Fun story: The article on Bagh, Azad Kashmir stated "The people of Bagh are brave, courageous and skilled, especially the artificers in the field of bakery & confectionery." Brave, courageous candymakers. You can't beat that! I have boldly removed that content.) I'm not married to deletion, so if a merge into Bagh, Azad Kashmir makes sense, consider this a a vote for that as well. Also, there appears to be a duplicate article at Danna (Pakistan), which I have nommed for speedy delete under A10, duplicate content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  S M S   Talk 19:35, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge Merge with Bagh, Azad Kashmir and then delete Danna,Bagh. Sajjad Altaf (talk) 19:57, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * As Wikipedia is a gazetteer also (per WP:FIVE), we don't delete articles about a locality or geographical location/place unless it is a WP:HOAX. Also it seems the place's full name is "Las Danna". And from a cursory search it appears the place do exists. So I agree with Cyphoidbomb 's Merge idea to its larger/parent sub division till we have some decent sources to back up that content and the article can stand on its own. -- S M S   Talk 19:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't believe this is accurate. Geographic localities must still satisfy GNG per WP:NGEO. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Note Appending to my last note, it would be better to merge with Bagh District than Bagh, Azad Kashmir since Bagh, Azad Kashmir is about Bagh city but Bagh District covers larger area and thus this mountain falls under Bagh District not Bagh, Azad Kashmir.
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 10:44, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Article fails WP:V. However if sources are found then I would support a merge as suggested above. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.