Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danniebelle Hall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Unsourced statements entail removal of the statements, not deletion of the entire article. Notability is established. Kafziel Talk 14:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Danniebelle Hall

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

per WP:COI, author is artist's daughter. Also, no references and only 20,000 hits on google. Yonatan (contribs/talk) 05:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per my own nomination Yonatan (contribs/talk) 05:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and cleanup. Passes WP:BAND, so COI is not a valid deletion reason.  I added one AllMusic.com reference to her page. Neier 06:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, a speedy keep would imply a nomination not in good faith, but the article did not have any independent sources. As they exist (e.g. ) it is keep. --Tikiwont 13:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, assertions about a living person lacking sources and references. If sources and references are added by end of this AfD change to keep Alf photoman 16:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Needs some concrete references and some more neutral wording but otherwise it seems notable. I think the reference to the author's web site constitutes original research.  -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 13:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.