Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Augustine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. seicer &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  13:07, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Danny Augustine

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

self-written vanity article, thousands of nn artists are featured somewhere, if he was notable, someone else would have written it Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 03:50, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable, vanity, possible hoax, etc.  Bilodeauzx (talk) 04:46, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, despite the absurd arguments given above. Young artist who is just not notable yet. There are large numbers of important artists who have no articles here, but he isn't one of them. This version (including copyvio from his website) gives his best shot.  Johnbod (talk) 10:46, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * comment to johnbod-and if those large numbers write their own articles on here, that also makes them vanity and worth suspicion. Whatever you're slinging absurd at can't be that absurd after all. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 16:37, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It certainly is absurd (as is the hoax allegation below it). According to you, it seems no new artist articles should be allowed - if they were notable "someone else would have written it"! Johnbod (talk) 22:00, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note per WP:Afd: The accusation VANITY should be avoided, and is not in itself a reason for deletion.  Ty  22:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not a hoax but still not notable. A COI biography that fails WP:CREATIVE. The one independent reference that did check out was for a state/local art prize. • Gene93k (talk) 11:38, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly not notable.--Shelly No (talk) 19:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom ....per .... Modernist (talk) 23:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.