Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Cockroach

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. There are a few userfy votes, but, as it has been pointed out, User:Danny Cockroach appears to have retired from Wikipedia. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:00, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Danny Cockroach
Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Reason given was "Vanity. <100 Google hits, most from the author or his own site.  Suggest userfy to User:Danny Cockroach". Pretty clearly band vanity.  &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 06:03, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. JamesBurns 06:45, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The website linked to in the article shows that this band is still competing in 'unsigned band' competitions. The tour dates are not exactly wide spread and major. Average Earthman 06:46, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable band. Maybe when they get signed, tour, and get, you know, fans, then re-add. jglc | t | c 16:00, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy or delete. Niteowlneils 16:30, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy --Xcali 19:08, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy You 20:21, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Changing my vote to delete. User's only edits are to this article, and to add a link to it to other articles; user was only active for one day (9 June 2005) and has not been back sense. No real point in userfying except to preserve the advertisement.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 20:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .