Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Fraticelli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Danny Fraticelli

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article was deproded by article creator without addressing the underlying concern of lack of significant reliable source coverage to establish notability. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Regards/ Article I think should not removed. The person is notable in Puerto Rico. I included newspapers articles from the top two newspaper here, also the link for the movie "Pedro" (MTV) and other links that shows part of his acting career. There are tons of interviews on TV programs but in youtube, so is imposible that way.... thanks Mroxidizer1 (talk) 20:59, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * More sources added Mroxidizer1 (talk) 22:08, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Weak Keep and allow continued improvements. Though certainly not worldwide, we can accept that notability to Puerto Rico is notable enough for Wikipedia.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:53, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per Schmidt. -- Lord Roem (talk) 00:32, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. The sourcing is minimal at the moment, but I think it is just enough for the article to be kept. —  Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 01:25, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Schmidt and Mr. Stradivarius above; needs lots more information and sources for both his involvement in Nino Planeta and his acting roles, but the kernel is there and the subject appears on the face of it to meet both the GNG and WP:MUSIC. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ talk 11:20, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.