Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Herrera (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. A proper merge discussion can take place on the article's talk page, if desired. ‑Scottywong | converse _ 16:29, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Danny Herrera (musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete, or redirect to Napalm Death. The lone reference is to an interview with the band Napalm Death, and that comes nowhere near establishing his notability. Most of his career has been with Napalm Death, so any salvageable content should be merged there with a link to the fact that he also played with Anaal Nathrakh. He is already listed at Danny Herrera (disambiguation). Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:01, 10 March 2013 (UTC) In this case, I find ghits for and 10,300 ghits for ... so unless somebody has some contrary data, any redirect should point to Napalm Death. However, I dount that the disambiguated title "Danny Herrera (musician)" is a plausible search term, so I see no need to create a redirect. The entry in Danny Herrera (disambiguation) is quite sufficient. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 *  Keep  - Per WP:NBAND, Danny is a member of at least 3 notable bands, Napalm Death, Anaal Nathrakh and Venemous Concept. --Jax 0677 (talk) 03:04, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Reply. That factoid can easily be mentioned in each of those band articles, in a few words which link to the other bands. This perma-stub adds no information which coukd not be easily accommodated elsewhere, and it adds no navigational benefit. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:18, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 *  Reply  - Again, how do we choose to which article to redirect Herrera? --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:10, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Reply. Simple: if we create a redirect, then we redirect to which ever band he is most closely associated with, because that will be most helpful to the reader.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 17 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep or Merge to Napalm Death as his primary band. We need to judge topics on the sources that exist, not just those that are cited in the article, but having said that, there seems to be little coverage out there beyond mentions of his membership of Napalm Death and Venomous Concept and a little about his drumming style:, , , , , . --Michig (talk) 08:22, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 *  Reply  - Michig, as you said about Bastian Emig, "But if he was only a member of one notable band we would at least leave a redirect to the band. Leaving nothing at all because he's a member of two notable bands doesn't seem to make much sense." So long as two of his three bands have articles, so should he. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:13, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge with Napalm Death. factoids about other bands can be mentioned there in a single sentence. Frietjes (talk) 15:21, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.