Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Kallis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per withdrawn by nominator.  Blurred   Lines  13:24, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Danny Kallis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article was a stub since the first time it was created, and it has not gotten any better. I think that this article should be removed from Wikipedia.  Blurred   Lines  23:29, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 23:34, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 23:34, 31 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - Nominated for 2 Primetime Emmys ..--Stemoc (talk) 00:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep - No valid rationale for deletion presented by nominator. Carrite (talk) 03:43, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Sir, I have no idea what you mean, I clearly gave a reason why it should be removed, saying that it needs a "valid rationale" makes no entirely sense.  Blurred   Lines   04:22, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Being a small article, an article not being worked on, an article being incomplete, an article not being sourced out (except in the case of Biographies of Living People) is not a recognized reason for deletion. Nor is not liking a subject. If one wants something to go away, they need to do at least cursory investigation which confirms that a subject does not meet inclusion criteria and then must state their case. This needn't be a complex case, just a simple statement that at least a basic effort was made and that the article does not meet the General Notability Guideline or any of the various Special Notability "low bars". I hope this helps. —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 05:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, being a stub not a reason for deletion. --Soman (talk) 04:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Has a claim of notability. Stubs are fine and if its too short WP:SOFIXIT. 209.255.230.32 (talk) 12:16, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.