Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny LAR


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:50, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Danny LAR

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Only an infobox for a seemingly non-notable character in an equally seemingly-not-notable soap opera that's still in draft form. Google only turns up results for a musician with the same name. (PROD reverted by the author with no explanation.) Bsoyka  ( talk ) 15:58, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete or Draftify no sources, no content. I would say merge with "LAR" article (if somehow the sources can be found for that; that it seems unlikely however), but the LAR article is still in draft space. Rlink2 (talk) 16:03, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's not even a stub. Artem.G (talk) 16:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: Couple of things I just found: also exists in the draftspace at Draft:Danny LAR, other related articles at Chester Joyt and Meena Ada. Bsoyka  ( talk ) 16:56, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - can't find any WP:RS. I wish there were an appropriate speedy deletion criterion. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:32, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, as it has no text content. A draft already exists at Draft:Danny LAR. Tol  (talk &#124; contribs) @ 17:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * See also Chester Joyt and Meena Ada (both prodded), also characters in the same soap opera. Tol  (talk &#124; contribs) @ 18:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify When you find incomplete pages like this, I think it's preferable to move the pages into Draft space rather than tag them for AFD or PROD deletion. It saves us from a week of discussion and the editor, usually a new one, can continue to work on their page and improve their editing skills. Drafts don't need to be deleted unless they pose more serious problems so it seems like a win-win situation. Liz Read! Talk! 02:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I guess I should clarify my comment above: it was already draftified. The editor made it again 13 minutes later in the mainspace, making no further edits to the draft. Bsoyka  ( talk ) 03:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Draft:Danny LAR exists and has the same infobox. I'm guessing that the page creator thought someone deleted the first page (the draft) when it was draftified. Rusty4321  talk contributions log 20:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @Rusty4321: The creator was left a talk page message when it was draftified. Tol  (talk &#124; contribs) @ 13:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, seriously, this is irredeemable. The creator seems inactive, and Draft:Danny LAR exists anyway. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.