Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny O'Neil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Cirt (talk) 04:33, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Danny O&

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

User:74.224.206.56 contacted me on my talk page and asked me to help with this AfD (they'd gotten as far as placing a tag, I guess not realizing that was as far as they could go). Their reasoning was "he is NOT a notable person." . This is purely procedural. Movingboxes (talk) 07:32, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject meets WP:ATHLETE as a notable college athlete, a player in a professional league (arena football) and the subject of non-trivial media coverage as a pastor after retirement. Movingboxes (talk) 07:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete for O'Neil, a college quarterback that never finished a single season in the arena league? How is this a notable person? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.224.206.56 (talk) 08:09, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The person concerned is of note in the specialist area of American College Football. Jaraalbe (talk) 07:40, 30 August 2008 (UTC
 * Keep - easily passes WP:BIO under the whole pro athlete, plus as MVP of the Rose Bowl (the granddady of them all I believe) I think would be a "notable award or honor" along with induction into the game's hall of fame. I would suggest the IP editor read the notability guidelines before nominating every U. of Oregon quarterback. Some likely fail notability, but others easily pass the long established guidelines at WP:BIO. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:41, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Its notable enough to stay here. Kalivd (talk) 14:20, 30 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep passes WP:BIO Ban  Ray  17:20, 30 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.