Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Peary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per the evidence of notability raised late during the course of the discussion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Danny Peary

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Based on my searching, doesn't meet either WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. Has been tagged for WP:OR for four years. Significant input from what I assume is the subject himself, contrary to WP:AUTO.

Article is sole-source to an encyclopedia.com article. Encyclopedia.com claims to be a reliable source, but I can't find anything that convinces me they have the editorial review processes required to be called that. In any case, it's a WP:TERTIARY source; we need WP:SECONDARY sources to meet WP:N. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:28, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   OxonAlex    - talk  15:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   OxonAlex    - talk  15:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   OxonAlex    - talk  15:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   OxonAlex    - talk  15:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment Even if there is a lack of in depth coverage there are literally dozens of sources that cite his books and this may tilt the balance for #1 of WP:NAUTHOR here are just a few.           If there was just one more in-depth source I would !vote to keep.--Dom from Paris (talk) 00:49, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep There are plenty of reviews of his books in contemporary papers digitised on Newspapers.com: Cult Movies, ; Alternate Oscars , , , ; Cult Movies II , ; Cult Baseball Players , ; We Played the Game ; 1,001 Reasons to Love Baseball - and plenty more. He definitely meets WP:NAUTHOR. RebeccaGreen (talk) 08:32, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the sources Rebecca Green and I found he meets #1 and #4 of WP:NAUTHOR. --Dom from Paris (talk) 08:41, 27 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.