Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Quah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP Marskell 11:37, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Danny Quah
Nn professor but hesitate to CSD. &hearts;&hearts;purpl e  feltangel  &hearts;  &hearts;  01:07, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. 35+ Publications, 10+ book chapters. Notable enough for me.--inks T 02:37, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable enough for me. To many claims for CSD:A7 though, so good call on the AfD  &hearts;&hearts;purpl  e  feltangel .  --Isotope23 02:43, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Full professor (which means a lot more than in the U.S) at a very prestigious institution. Honbicot 03:48, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep notable academic. -- DS1953 talk 04:14, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep . A professor of Economics at the London School of Economics with some notable papers to his credit. Capitalistroadster 04:49, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wouldn't be professor at LSE if he wasn't notable in his field. Uppland 09:41, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Rd232 talk 15:48, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per above.--Alhutch 17:07, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. As usual, no deletion required. Trollderella 17:51, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep all notable professors. And that means all professors in countries like Britain where the title is reserved for the upper end of the academic ladder. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 20:59, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I've read the Monetarist paper, I think. Hipocrite - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 13:04, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm probably the first one who quoted Quah in the economic inequality article. Someone else created his entry. It was interesting to know who Quah was and his work. Another Wikipedian 03:46, 29 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.