Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Raven Tan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:11, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Danny Raven Tan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Highly promotional article. Other than the todayonline article, could find no other in-depth coverage of this artist. And todayonline is a free magazine, and I could find no discussion of their editorial practices, so not sure that it even passes RS. Regardless, searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG, and certainly doesn't meet WP:NARTIST. Was deprodded without rationale or improvement by the article's creator.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't see any credible claim of significance or importance. A bunch of school projects and a "gallery" in his own apartment do not amount to notable accomplishments. There is no sign of a critical assessment of his work. Mduvekot (talk) 22:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU  (T/C) 01:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as an unsourced BLP with no claim to notability and totally promotional in tone. --Lockley (talk) 05:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * delete does not meet GNG. Sourcing not sufficient.Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.