Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Shea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Danny Shea
A borderline case, but I feel this individual does not meet the criteria in WP:BIO. Perhaps later, but not now. Crystallina 03:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Since when does contributing to a student journal made you notable? And as for the rest, there are millions of bloggers out there. Yandman 08:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. As the influence of the new media grows, so too does that of its stars. This young man seems to be among the more prominent/reputable bloggers, certainly writing for legitimate outlets, and he does seem to have a genuine following.  I vote to keep it. ICW10003 01:32, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Users sole contribution to Wikipedia
 * Keep. No need to delete this. The student is known in the blogsophere as an important contributor to an important website. I would say he is certainly notable on The Huffington Post - in August the site recorded 2.5 million unique visitors and 34 million page views. His writing has probably reached more readers than a large number of authors on Wikipedia.
 * Comment: IP 140.180.17.70, this is it's only contribution to Wikipedia
 * Delete. This isn't even borderline. The "sole contribution" posts above are sufficiently convincing. Michael Kinyon 10:59, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nowhere near meeting WP:BIO. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Writes for a blog. ergot 16:05, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.