Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Silk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tim Song (talk) 01:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Danny Silk

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not enough reliable, third party coverage to justify a separate article for this person. Fails WP:BIO/WP:N. Another article in a similar situation as this one (pastor at the same church) is Kris Vallotton which I also nom'd for AFD. Killiondude (talk) 00:30, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - for now and move the article back to user space until such time that it meets mandatory notability requirements...or not.  Sean.hoyland  - talk 08:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:BLP. StAnselm (talk) 05:08, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is not a small country church/sunday school.  Silk and Vallotton are key players in a global movement which impacts tens of thousands of people worldwide.  (Check out iBethel.tv.) I know the pages are rough.  I'll try to work on them this week.  Thanks! RichLindvall (talk) 15:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Those are not valid reasons to keep an article. Reasons need to policy based. Articles need to comply with policies.  Sean.hoyland  - talk 04:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.