Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danqun Fang (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Danqun Fang
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Messy promotional writing, which makes notability difficult to ascertain. All substantive edits were done by a single editor who has no other edits. Previously deleted in 2012, but only as copyright violation and not on the merits of notability. Unless shown to be notable, delete. --Nlu (talk) 18:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:19, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:20, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:20, 25 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete for now. I am not prepared to support this BLP until a reliable GS profile is available. Even then, BLP is full of bloat and should be cut down to 20% of present length. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:09, 26 April 2020 (UTC).
 * Delete does not pass notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Hatchens (talk) 06:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ms4263nyu (talk) 14:50, 1 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.