Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danyel Gérard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. NW ( Talk ) 00:35, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Danyel Gérard

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced BLP tagged as such since April 2009. As such, although the article claims to easily pass WP:MUSICBIO, there's no way to verify any of the content.  Gazi moff  13:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi. Have you followed WP:BEFORE and read the articles, book entries, etc on him?  I haven't read through them, but there appear to be a quite a number.  Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:50, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Per WP:LOTSOFSOURCES, there may be some out there. But without specifying which ones in particular and ensuring that it still gets updated, it's still an unreferenced BLP. Many thanks,,  Gazi moff  17:53, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 04:33, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Strong Snow Keep. Billboard calls him a notable artist, and then there is Hit singles: top 20 charts from 1954 to the present day By Dave McAleer,, , The MGM Labels: 1961-1982 By Michel Ruppli, Ed Novitsky, Popular music in contemporary France: authenticity, politics, debate By David Looseley, , Stardom in postwar France By John Gaffney, Diana Holmes, and then I got tired.  A google search reveals many, many similar sources reflecting notability under WP:BAND, likely under more than one criterion but certainly under criteria 1, 2, and 5.--Epeefleche (talk) 21:19, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: I agree with above. - Ret.Prof (talk) 12:09, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep: Per Epeefleche. Joe Chill (talk) 03:19, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep.: The sources identified by Epeefleche have been incorporated into the article which has been expanded. J04n(talk page) 02:54, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.