Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danzelman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCDe ✉ 16:35, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Danzelman
Neologism, original research, on sexual practice, unverifiable, WP:BALLS MNewnham 22:37, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Muchness 23:14, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BALLS. Stifle 09:35, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.