Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daphne Jackson Medal and Prize


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfy - move to userspace. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 19:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Daphne Jackson Medal and Prize

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no third party sources to show notability of the award, as an award. Sources exists that might indicate possible notability for the individual given the prize, but that would not make the prixe notable. The prize is too new for there to be an established tradition or expectation that anyone receiving the prize is presumably notable. The IOP gives both major and minor prizes--the major ones given by this famous professional organization do shown notability, but not all of the minor ones. The future may show differently, but at this time, its not yet notable.  DGG ( talk ) 03:27, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * To be fair, it is very early days. The prize has only just been awarded for the first time, but given the coverage of the awardee I would not be surprised if secondary sources trickle through. T0mpr1c3 (talk) 04:36, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:11, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, w umbolo   ^^^  13:16, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * In the absence of further input either for or against I am considering moving it to Draft. T0mpr1c3 (talk) 22:39, 2 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment, "To be fair, it is very early days. The prize has only just been awarded for the first time..", so it may be a case of WP:TOOSOON, might a redirect be appropriate to the Legacy section of Daphne Jackson (already mentioned there), with a little bit of expansion? Coolabahapple (talk) 09:49, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * That's certainly a possibility. I have draftified for now. 🝨⚬ʍP (talk) 15:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * A different editor has now moved the draft back to main space. As the creator of the page I would prefer that it moved to draft than deleted. 🝨⚬ʍP (talk) 02:24, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * That's because you can't unilateraly decide what happens here. You can vote, but the consensus on what to do will be judged by a third-party. I would support either draftifying it or moving it to a subpage of your userpage (i.e. userfying). w umbolo   ^^^  08:00, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Either would be fine by me. 🝨⚬ʍP (talk) 14:11, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:31, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * would you agree to userfying? w umbolo   ^^^  14:43, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Certainly I would agree-- I would suggest userification rather than moving to draft, becauseit will be anohter year until the 2nd award.  DGG ( talk ) 15:56, 9 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.