Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daphne Rosen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:20, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Daphne Rosen

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet notability for Pornographic actors and models, she never won an award (only was in a movie that won), only nominated once for an award, has not unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre, etc Saladacaesar (talk) 07:57, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - agreed. WP:PORNBIO is not met. Colon el  Tom 11:49, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom, especially due to the heightened sensitivity required for a BLP.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 16:47, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 20 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep, a famous performer. Askadaleia (talk) 01:44, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * As Notability (people) states being "famous" is secondary to being notable. Also there are no sources to verify she is famous. JoshyDinda (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, prominent role in AVN Award-winning film, coverage in multiple secondary sources. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:00, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Too many sources are IMDB and other unreliable sources. e.g.  MathewTownsend (talk) 02:35, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails notability for Porno. --Cox wasan (talk) 18:21, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not enough significant coverage in reliabe sources to establish notability. Fails both GNG and PORNBIO. JoshyDinda (talk) 14:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, a famous performer with significant presence in the adult industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swingboy (talk • contribs) 00:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * As Notability (people) states being "famous" is secondary to being notable. Also there are no sources to verify she is famous. JoshyDinda (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.