Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daphne Rosen (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW. Note that the article creator cut-and-pasted the article to their user talk page; I have taken this as a request for userification and have accordingly done so. The Bushranger One ping only 22:50, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Daphne Rosen
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 17:04, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 17:04, 2 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete This article was deleted in November via XFD. Recently recreated by User:Bigbreastslover18. Article was correctly tagged for speedy deletion on G4 grounds, but was denied by an admin because "Nope, completely different content." As far as I recall the article looks the same as the deleted article, except for perhaps now it utilizes sourced entirely inappropriate for a BLP.  brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 14:55, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Clearly not notable. Fails WP:PORNSTAR. Article claims her biggest accomplishment was winning an AVN award for a group sex scene, but per WP:PORNSTAR: "Nominations and awards in scene-related and ensemble categories are excluded from consideration." And we won't even discuss the ridiculous sourcing in the article, half of which comes from the subject's own website. --76.189.114.163 (talk) 15:57, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Should have been speedied. Epbr123 (talk) 16:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails specific tests for genre and makes no other claims of notability. Celtechm (talk) 17:38, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, natch. I'm the one that put it up for speedy delete.  It's essentially the same content that I remember and it still fails WP:PORNBIO.  Dismas |(talk) 17:44, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails GNG, not the topic of multiple instances of independent published coverage in so-called reliable sources. No, Boobpedia doesn't count... Carrite (talk) 17:49, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 2 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails GNG without substantial reliable source coverage. Fails PORNBIO without individual awards or nominations. The 2005 scene-related AVN win is questionable. IMDb says she won but AVN doesn't. • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 2 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP: PORNBIO; no claims of notability. Electric Catfish 01:52, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Really good article, it shall be kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigbreastslover18 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 4 August 2012 (UTC)  — Bigbreastslover18 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep This article is too sparse in its current form, but Rosen is an adult movie producer and a radio personality, and hence notable in those aspects. She also founded Cutienet.com. I vote keep as it can be improved. Asarelah (talk) 17:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Where are the reliable sources that can establish notability per WP:CREATIVE or WP:ENT? My searches only find Rosen's website, Boobpedia, adultfyi, etc. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Indeed! If you can find sources for that and add it to the article, I'd be willing to change my opinion.  I know Rosen is well known in the industry but this is one of those cases where someone is well known and not been written about much at all which makes verification of notability tough.  Dismas |(talk) 20:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I can't seem to locate anything meeting the criteria. =/ Asarelah (talk) 23:04, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:PORNBIO and is not well written. as is it also Fails WP:DUE... BO &#124; Talk 23:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.