Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dar Al Sharq Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Those who want to keep the article do not point to any sources that would satisfy our requirements. Modussiccandi (talk) 13:00, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Dar Al Sharq Group

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Promotional article. If independent coverage of the corporation (as opposed to individual newspapers) is considered sufficiently in-depth to meet WP:NCORP, then I suggest that WP:TNT would apply. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Companies,  and Qatar.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:40, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep There is a huge amount of coverage in Arabic. This is a large company which seems to have a political slant and controls multiple international media outlets. There is a lot that could be done with this article and the promotional language is fairly limited, so WP:TNT would be overkill in my opinion. Chagropango (talk) 14:29, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello Chagropango. Which articles do you believe support that WP:NCORP is met? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Mild keep could be a good stub. A 4000 employee company with $14B revenue could be notable, however the sources right now are not good. TNT is good, but I lean towards making it a small stub. I think local Arab-speaking wikipedians would be helpful here. 多少 战场 龙 (talk) 09:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I am unable to locate any references which meet (or even come close to) NCORP's criteria for establishing notability. The Keep !votes are not based on any of our guidelines. Chagropango was invited to list articles that met NCORP (nearly two weeks ago) to support their !vote and there has been silence since. 多少战场龙 noted the topic "could be notable" but also admitted the "sources right now are not good" - over a week later, there have been no improvements and no new sources have appeared. Topic fails NCORP.  HighKing++ 12:07, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:NCORP. –– FormalDude  (talk)  16:45, 20 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.