Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darcy Antonellis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 00:28, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Darcy Antonellis

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article fails to address WP:BIO. Being a president of technical operations is no guarantee of encyclopaedic notability. The most used quote from Antonellis has been about copyright but previous non-neutral text claiming to be "one of" the industries leaders on this issue is not supported by definitive sources and it seems unlikely that sustained impact on the historic record will be demonstrable in the near future. Previous maintenance template for notability deleted and so pragmatically skipping a PROD and raising for wider discussion. Fæ (talk) 10:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 11:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 11:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Found several newspaper articles about the subject, discussing her in much detail; See the Daily Variety's "DARCY ANTONELLIS, exec VP, distribution and technology operations, Warner Bros. Technical Operations; senior VP, worldwide antipiracy operations, Warner Bros. Entertainment" and "Warner Bros. technical ops ups two exex", along with The Daily News of Los Angeles' "NEWEST WB HERO REAL PIRATE FIGHTER". I will attempt to rewrite the article now. Ironholds (talk) 17:28, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * After much wailing, gnashing of teeth and going "OH GOD WHAT HAVE I DONE" (see the edit history) I think I've resolved any notability and spam problems. Two emmy awards, a string of high-profile appointments and a Society Fellowship seems to qualify one for notability - particularly when backed up by reliable sources. Ironholds (talk) 18:27, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:30, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - With the new sources for awards added by Ironholds, I suggest this AfD can be safely closed. Fæ (talk) 22:39, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.