Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darcy Burner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 09:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Darcy Burner
Article is about a candidate for public office. Article does not show enough notority to warrant inclusion outside of the fact she is a candidate for office. Wildthing61476 20:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete If she gets elected, then we have a different animal, until then please delete. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 20:34, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom -- Whpq 22:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep because of the number of sources cited. I think the number of sources indicates enough notability. At the very least, Merge with an article about the election itself. That's what Candidates and elections suggests anyhow. Elections first, then individual candidates. Allisonmontgomery69 22:20, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete many people who've led interesting lives run for office. Until she wins and is elected I cannot see how this meets the requirements of WP:BIO - Peripitus (Talk) 03:44, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per WP:C&E. -- Mwalcoff 23:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep This is nuts. Of course this should be kept. She is a major force in Washington State politics right now and is in one of the hottest Congressional races this year.--8bitJake 03:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete 31 hits on Google makes my cat mittens more notable. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 20:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Try 444,000 hits on Google. 131.107.0.103 19:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * keep please she is notable right now article is good too Yuckfoo 20:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete A candidate for office and ,oohh, she worked for Microsoft. And the article is a blatant puff piece. Delete until she is elected. DJ Clayworth 19:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, but clean up massively. It reads like a campaign flyer. --badlydrawnjeff talk 02:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.