Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daria Adamantina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MastCell Talk 18:03, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Daria Adamantina

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Subject appears to be a non-notable Actress, minimal Google hits, no Google news hits, all external links are to self published sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Monty 845  15:21, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Scopecreep (talk) 15:24, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Scopecreep (talk) 15:24, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, unreferenced WP:BLP, no assertion of notability per WP:NACTOR, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Scopecreep (talk) 15:23, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Also note that the Spanish Wikipedia version es:Daria Adamantina has been deleted three times yesterday and today, as a hoax. Scopecreep (talk) 15:30, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Editor on Portuguese WP Usuária:Daria Adamantina has been blocked for 2 days for misuse of her user page, and fr:Daria Adamantina was speedied A7 today. Scopecreep (talk) 15:43, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * See also: WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Dari Feitosa Scopecreep (talk) 19:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. Sarah (talk) 16:58, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete this WP:BLP violation of a minor with haste. This youtube "actress" and her "film projects" are not covered by reliable sources and are found only on social networking and other non RS sites. We have no verifiability.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, no connection to notable films. Dimadick (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. I was the one who nominated the previous version for speedy deletion. It should not be allowed to be re-created. Fails WP:GNG. Michitaro (talk) 23:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD G3. Out of Wikipedia, blogs and social networks, no results were found. Francisco (talk) 11:30, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't think that G3 is right tag for it though being not at all notable. But still should be deleted. → TheSpecialUser TalkContributions* 08:23, 22 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.