Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dario Chioli (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 03:42, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Dario Chioli
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I had proposed this for speedy deletion as I cannot find any claim to notability; now I bring it here. Apparently Google does not return anything relevant about him apart from wiki mirrors, a personal website ("superzeko.net" is edited by himself) and some commercial site selling his books. Goochelaar (talk) 07:18, 15 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete I got 16,000 Google hits for "Dario Chioli," and while my cursory examination didn't yield any obviously Reliable sources (some were not in English, as to be rather expected of an Italian poet), some of the links looked like they might hold promise.  And there were still quite a few others I hadn't looked at.  Its not at all clear he's Notable, and without proper Sourcing, there's no way to know.  If this were the article's first Nomination for Deletion, or it were relatively new, I would vote Weak Keep, but as this is its second Nomination for Deletion, and as its been around for nearly four years, I can't really justify its continued existence. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 11:29, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Seems vaguely known only on a small subset of Italian new-age or exoteric sites, nowhere near enough notability. --Cyclopia (talk) 15:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not sufficiently notable per WP:BIO. Appears also to have been rejected by our Italian counterparts: Location (talk) 22:05, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.